Thread started: Jan 16 2010, 9:04 AM EST
Watch
I think it'shorrible the way the writers ended Georges character. My wife and I are Grey's addicts now.....I have so many opinions and thoughts on the way the story line goes......the writers missed the mark on George. He is the show as far as I'm concerned. Grey's won't be the same without him whatever the writers do now.
out of
found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
Show Last Reply
|
|
Last Reply:
RE: george's exit from the show
By: ,
Mar 13 2010, 6:03 PM EST
This thread is old news by now, but meh... Here go my two cents anyway...
I also felt for George's departure, but specially the way it happened. I mean, they could have just let him go to the army (completely sudden and out of the blue as it was) to never be seen again, period. The brutal disfiguring in front of bus death was horrible, unnecessary and unworthy of the character. I guess the writers wanted a bang, and they kind of got it.
As for the character's importance, well, I felt he had long lost his central role on the show, and frankly he was getting kind of too weird on the relationships department. For the humane person/surgeon at the same time, we had Izzie already. True that now she's gone too... Well, Alex has been a better guy now and Bailey is all freaky with the anesthesiologist guy. Even Mark wants a family and babies now... -_-
out of
found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
|
